AI Prompts LinkedIn Personal Brand

The AI LinkedIn Headshot Prompt That Started the Trend

One prompt, one selfie, and a profile photo that looks like you paid a photographer. Here is the original, plus the line-by-line breakdown of why it works that most versions leave out.

A professional LinkedIn headshot generated with the prompt in this article
Made with the exact prompt below, from a phone selfie taken facing a window.

I first shared this prompt on Instagram, and it spread further than anything I have ever made. Watching other creators and thousands of you recreate it, tweak it, and post your own versions has genuinely been my favourite thing this year.

I still get DMs about it every week, which is why I finally wrote the complete version down. This is the original, plus everything I have learned since about getting it right. Here is the reel that started it.

What is in this blog

  1. The input photo rules nobody mentions
  2. The prompt
  3. Why each line is in there
  4. Variations for your industry
  5. When it comes out wrong
  6. The line you should not cross
  7. Uploading it to LinkedIn properly

1. The input photo rules nobody mentions

This is where almost every failed attempt actually fails. People blame the prompt when the problem was the selfie they fed it. The model can only preserve detail that exists in your source image, so a blurry photo gives you a blurry stranger.

Before you write anything, find a photo where:

A plain, well-lit selfie taken against a blank wall beats a professionally shot photo that is dim or low resolution. Sharpness and even light matter more than the setting.

2. The prompt

Paste this into an image model, attach your reference photo, and send. It works in ChatGPT, Gemini, and any image tool that accepts a reference image.

The prompt
Create image

Hyper-realistic professional headshot of the person in the reference image, preserving their facial features and likeness. Square 1:1 composition, chest-up, face filling the frame with tight headroom. Direct eye contact, slight genuine smile, approachable and confident. Wearing a tailored charcoal blazer with visible texture. Clean studio background in soft muted blue-gray for strong subject separation. Soft overhead softbox lighting, natural catchlights in the eyes, realistic skin texture with visible pores and fine hair detail. Shot on an 85mm lens at f/2, smooth background blur. Modern, clean, warm color grade.

3. Why each line is in there

This is the part that usually gets stripped out when the prompt gets passed around, and it is the part that actually matters. If you understand what each clause is doing, you can adapt it instead of hoping it works.

4. Variations for your industry

The base prompt is deliberately conservative because it has to work for everyone. Adjust the wardrobe and background, and keep everything else identical.

Change one thing at a time. If you rewrite half the prompt and the result is worse, you will not know which change caused it.

5. When it comes out wrong

Four failure modes cover almost everything people run into.

It does not look like me

Your input photo is the problem nine times out of ten. Go back to section 1. If the photo is genuinely good, add this to the end of the prompt: "Keep the face identical to the reference image. Do not alter face shape, nose, jawline, or eye spacing."

The skin looks plastic

Strengthen the texture instruction: "Photographic skin texture with visible pores, fine lines, and natural imperfections. Do not smooth or retouch the skin." Telling it explicitly not to retouch works better than asking for texture alone.

The smile is too much

Replace "slight genuine smile" with "relaxed neutral expression with a hint of warmth in the eyes."

It looks like a stock photo

Usually the background is too clean and the pose too centred. Add "slight natural asymmetry in posture, head turned a few degrees off centre." Perfect symmetry is what makes an image feel manufactured.

6. The line you should not cross

Here is the part I care about most, and the part that gets left out of every version of this I have seen.

An AI headshot that does not look like you will cost you more than a bad photo ever would. You will get on the video call, and the person on the other end will spend the first thirty seconds quietly recalibrating. That is a genuinely bad way to start an interview, and it is entirely avoidable.

The rule

A real photographer would fix your lighting, your framing, and maybe your collar. They would not change your face. Use AI for the things a photographer controls, not the things they cannot.

Concretely: adjust lighting, framing, background, and wardrobe as much as you like. Do not change your face shape, your skin tone, your age, or your body. If you would not recognise yourself in a lineup from the photo, start again.

The goal is not to look like someone else. It is to look like you on a day when the lighting happened to be excellent.

7. Uploading it to LinkedIn properly

You did the work, do not lose it at the last step.

Your photo gets someone to stop. Your headline and About section are what make them message you. If the photo is the only thing you fix this week, you have done a third of the job.

Photo sorted. Now the rest of the application.

A great headshot gets you looked at. What gets you interviewed is a resume that matches the job description. PinkaHireAI reads the posting, scores your fit, and rewrites your bullets to match, then writes the cover letter, the cold DM, and the follow up.

Try it free for 3 days → No credit card needed.
Stop rewriting your resume by hand Tailored applications in seconds, not evenings.
Try it free →